Jack's strong but that's not his forte and he's clever but not a super-genius, so I think 12s are appropriate. Very roughly, maybe ST 12, DX 16+, IQ 12, HT 14+.
SAMURAI JACK SEASON 4 SPEECH FULL
Spouting tired buzzwords does not invalidate that, but it does invalidate any point you're trying to make.Īt work, so I can't write up a full character sheet, but I can point out key bits of Jack.Īttributes: High stats all around (being a singular protagonist, Jack can't really afford to have major deficiencies). There is really no actual argument against anything John Cleese says in that video, or anything I've said: all research into creativity says the same thing. Your argument continues to be unintelligent. If you don't care about creativity, then you don't belong on /tg/ and you absolutely don't need to be on /tg/, because any rule you wish to discuss can be found via google. I urge you to watch the video: it might change your mind, by helping you understand what creativity is and how it works. Once, they tried to draw one, and it killed the board until they erased it. There is no clearly defined line for determining the difference between these.
Now aggressive shitposting on the other hand, does not provide much inspiration, or help creativity or playfulness. Because that kills inspiration, creativity, and playfulness. Your "consistency" is autistic and unintelligent: the consistency of rule enforcement which /tg/ needs is that things which inspire people, and it's very hard to say ahead of time what inspires people, must not be killed. No, we'll report it and it'll be deleted, most likely. It's just pointless, and it cannot be anything other than disappointing. It's not going to be for us, it's going to be for people born after the show was already cancelled. You cannot be stupid enough to think that they want to bring this show out to please the nostalgia of maybe a 1/5th of their audience.
The execs cancelled it because it wasn't Toyetic enough. If that's the kind of quality we get to look forward to, then I'm even more excited than before. Resolving the conflict isn't the point of the show. I accepted that because i know that these things cannot continue forever, and that whatever they do to resolve the conflict won't be interesting. How is this not "technically" a continuation when that is exactly what they are doing: continuing the plot that was never actually resolved?īecause it was never meant to end. >Samurai Jack never had an actual conclusion. What /tg/ is, is a place for finding out what you want to fill that other half with. tg/ on the other hand is sitting with a half-finished product, where the other half is created by the GM and the players. They discuss a final product, so they don't need that same openness or loose moderation. It's also a matter of inspiration: Samurai Jack has inspired tons of roleplayers, and will continue to do so, so not only does the shared love for it create an environment where people can be on good and open terms with one another, and therefore be creative, but the direct aesthetic, thematic, etc. It also stops lateral thinking, which is a very important thing to nurture here, because it's impossible to predict what will spawn new ideas. The thing is that you absolutely can't harshly enforce a narrow definition of the rules on an actually creative board like /tg/, because doing so smothers the creative process, as it stops people from being able to relax and be open to making and taking suggestions.
0 kommentar(er)
